3 min read654 words

Are There Contradictions in the Bible, or Just Misunderstood Passages?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
No, there are no contradictions in the Bible. Where people think they see a clash, it’s a misunderstood passage, a partial view, or a failure to rightly divide the Word.

2) Scriptural explanation
- The Bible says all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:16). If God breathed it, He didn’t contradict Himself.
- It is impossible for God to lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18).
- The Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35).
- Every word of God is pure (Proverbs 30:5), and the sum of His Word is truth (Psalm 119:160).
- No prophecy of the Scripture is of private interpretation; holy men spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost (2 Peter 1:20–21).
- The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14). That’s why revelation is needed.
- We are told to rightly divide the Word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15) and compare line upon line, precept upon precept (Isaiah 28:10).

3) Simple clarifying logic
One Author does not disagree with Himself. What causes trouble is:
- Not noting who is speaking and to whom.
- Mixing time and setting—different covenants, different purposes.
- Reading one report of an event and ignoring another that completes the picture.
- Taking figures of speech as contradictions instead of seeing God speaking to us in simple, human terms.
- Stopping at a verse instead of letting the whole counsel of God answer.

4) Quick harmonizing examples
- Faith and works: Romans 3:28 says a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law; James 2:24 says a man is justified by works and not by faith only. There’s no clash. Paul is showing how we are made right before God—by faith alone apart from law-works. James is showing the proof of that faith before men—living faith produces works. Abraham believed God (Genesis 15), and years later his obedience vindicated that faith (Genesis 22).
- Judas’ death and the field: Matthew 27:5 says Judas hanged himself. Acts 1:18 says he fell headlong and burst. He hanged himself; later he fell and burst. Both are true. Matthew 27:7 says the priests bought the field with his money; Acts 1:18 says he acquired a field. He did so by proxy—his money purchased it.
- Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew 1 traces the legal royal line through Joseph; Luke 3 traces the bloodline through David’s other son, with Joseph named “as was supposed” and standing as son-in-law to Heli. No contradiction—two lines pointing to the same promised Seed.
- Resurrection reports: One Gospel mentions one angel, another mentions two. If there were two, mentioning one does not deny the other—different witnesses, different details. The women listed differ because each writer highlights what serves his purpose. The message is one: He rose.
- “God repented” vs “God does not repent”: 1 Samuel 15 speaks of God “repenting” about Saul’s kingship—God changed His dealings with Saul because Saul changed. Numbers 23:19 says God does not repent like a man—His nature and promise do not change. When man moves, God’s response changes; God Himself remains true. See Jonah 3:10 and Jeremiah 18:7–10.
- “Three days and three nights”: Jesus said He would rise the third day (Luke 24:7) and also spoke of three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40). In Jewish reckoning, part of a day counts as a day and a night. The testimony is consistent: He rose on the third day, exactly as He said.

Reinforcing statement
Now notice, if Scripture can be broken, why did Jesus say it cannot be broken? You see, the problem is never the Word; it is our understanding. Take all the passages together, let the Spirit who wrote it reveal it, and the seeming contradictions disappear. The Bible stands perfect.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 35

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §84

That's the way they say today, "What church do you belong to if you're a Christian? What denomination?" "None." They don't get it. See, they can't understand it. They think a denomination means a Christian. It's vice versa, very much so. But it's misunderstood by the people. Now, we find out that Herod misunderstood it. He couldn't understand it. Nicodemus couldn't understand it, the new birth, when he came to Jesus by night. Someone condemned him. I don't condemn him. He was a good man, he wanted to find out somet...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 35

Marriage and Divorce

Sunday morning, the 21st of February 1965 at the Parkview Junior High School in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

65-0221M §89

Went right on revealing it, the way He revealed His Word, but dare any one of us to try to put away Him and marry another. Now, surely it's plain why both theories are wrong. You can't make it run this way; it's gone. You make it run that, it'd run plumb past the promise. Here's the promise. Here's the thing right here. The Word is not contradictory; it has to stay in continuity. Now, no more than Matthew 28:19 contradicts Acts 2:38. Now, some of you women, some of you men, I know you're disagreeing with it because...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 34

Perseverance

Sunday, the 18th of February 1962

62-0218 §83

Now, remember, His Word is a sword. The Bible said so. It's a sword. Hebrews, the 4 ... 4:12, if you want to put that down. Hebrews 4:12, said, He's ... "The Word of God is sharper than a two-edged sword." Let me stop here just a minute. Listen. "The Word of God is sharper than a two-edged sword, piercing even to the asunder of the bone, and so forth, the marrow, and a discerner of the thoughts of the heart." Is that right? Let's stop just a minute, think now, "A discerner of the thoughts of the heart." Does the Sc...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 34

Sirs, we would see Jesus

Friday, the 4th of January 1957

57-0104 §9

I have noticed, many times, that--that sometimes we might get the... And it does happen that way; we get built up on a fantastic or some little phenomena of something, and we run off with it. But if you'll just keep it right in the Bible, then you got THUS SAITH THE LORD, and God will honor His Word. My word will fail. Your word will fail. And no man's word is... No man is any better than his word. If you can't... If I couldn't take your word, I--I just can't believe you. That's all. And that's the way I believe Go...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 34

One man's influence on another

Saturday, the 13th of October 1962

62-1013 §99

Them denominations try to take the place of the holy church. "We believe in God the Father, Almighty, Creator of heavens and earth, and Jesus Christ His Son. We believe in the holy Roman Catholic church," and all these different things. "We believe in communion of saints." I believe in the communion of Christ. Yes, sir! I believe saints are in glory, sure. But I believe we have one mediator between God and man. Yes, sir! Poke that stuff... Here, the Bible contradicts that. They say, "Well that's the Bible." That's...

Read source context