3 min read654 words

Are There Contradictions in the Bible, or Just Misunderstood Passages?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
No, there are no contradictions in the Bible. Where people think they see a clash, it’s a misunderstood passage, a partial view, or a failure to rightly divide the Word.

2) Scriptural explanation
- The Bible says all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:16). If God breathed it, He didn’t contradict Himself.
- It is impossible for God to lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18).
- The Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35).
- Every word of God is pure (Proverbs 30:5), and the sum of His Word is truth (Psalm 119:160).
- No prophecy of the Scripture is of private interpretation; holy men spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost (2 Peter 1:20–21).
- The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14). That’s why revelation is needed.
- We are told to rightly divide the Word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15) and compare line upon line, precept upon precept (Isaiah 28:10).

3) Simple clarifying logic
One Author does not disagree with Himself. What causes trouble is:
- Not noting who is speaking and to whom.
- Mixing time and setting—different covenants, different purposes.
- Reading one report of an event and ignoring another that completes the picture.
- Taking figures of speech as contradictions instead of seeing God speaking to us in simple, human terms.
- Stopping at a verse instead of letting the whole counsel of God answer.

4) Quick harmonizing examples
- Faith and works: Romans 3:28 says a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law; James 2:24 says a man is justified by works and not by faith only. There’s no clash. Paul is showing how we are made right before God—by faith alone apart from law-works. James is showing the proof of that faith before men—living faith produces works. Abraham believed God (Genesis 15), and years later his obedience vindicated that faith (Genesis 22).
- Judas’ death and the field: Matthew 27:5 says Judas hanged himself. Acts 1:18 says he fell headlong and burst. He hanged himself; later he fell and burst. Both are true. Matthew 27:7 says the priests bought the field with his money; Acts 1:18 says he acquired a field. He did so by proxy—his money purchased it.
- Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew 1 traces the legal royal line through Joseph; Luke 3 traces the bloodline through David’s other son, with Joseph named “as was supposed” and standing as son-in-law to Heli. No contradiction—two lines pointing to the same promised Seed.
- Resurrection reports: One Gospel mentions one angel, another mentions two. If there were two, mentioning one does not deny the other—different witnesses, different details. The women listed differ because each writer highlights what serves his purpose. The message is one: He rose.
- “God repented” vs “God does not repent”: 1 Samuel 15 speaks of God “repenting” about Saul’s kingship—God changed His dealings with Saul because Saul changed. Numbers 23:19 says God does not repent like a man—His nature and promise do not change. When man moves, God’s response changes; God Himself remains true. See Jonah 3:10 and Jeremiah 18:7–10.
- “Three days and three nights”: Jesus said He would rise the third day (Luke 24:7) and also spoke of three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40). In Jewish reckoning, part of a day counts as a day and a night. The testimony is consistent: He rose on the third day, exactly as He said.

Reinforcing statement
Now notice, if Scripture can be broken, why did Jesus say it cannot be broken? You see, the problem is never the Word; it is our understanding. Take all the passages together, let the Spirit who wrote it reveal it, and the seeming contradictions disappear. The Bible stands perfect.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 34

Godhead explained

Thursday afternoon, the 19th of January 1961 at the Golden Arrow Restaurant in Beaumont, Texas, U.S.A.

61-0119A §79

And I've tried to be like a Christian brother to them, never mention it amongst the people, just go ahead, because, Lord, I believe they are your children. But they find these seemingly contradictions in the Bible, and they've made a great issue out of it. The Assemblies would not associate with the Oneness, the Oneness was called ... which we know now in hearing this meeting, fellowshipping with some of those brethren. And we do in every meeting. But, Lord, we know they're all your children, but they made a great...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 34

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §106

Oh, I love that. Don't you? Crossed over Jordan to Canaan's fair land, I bid farewell to the world, lifted up above the things of the world, now I'm living in this heavenly atmosphere. Sure, I act funny to them buzzards down there. Yes, sir, I'm flying above it. That's right. What do we care? We are living in Canaan's land. Amen! Yes, sir. Eating the new grapes, just having a wonderful time---full of glory, full of power, full of the Holy Spirit. Yes, sir. Said, "Stephen was a man, full..." Full of what? Full of wh...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 33

The Queen of Sheba

Friday evening, the 1st of April 1960 at the Municipal Auditorium in Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

60-0401E §1

[Pastor introduces Brother Lamsa.] ... he speaks the language and can read the language and read the original documents in which the New Testament was written. So with him, it is so wonderful that he can read directly from the original script the very words that Jesus and the disciples spoke and wrote. He felt that these translations that we have are not always correct and true. And that's where the criticism comes in, because he criticizes the King James version, and some people think that St. Paul preached from t...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 32

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §74

That's what God was doing to Israel. You know He said, "As the eagle stirreth up her nest..." That's the same thing. He found Israel in a howling land down there, and He brought him up out of Egypt and took him into the promised land, on the wings of an eagle, see. And what was God doing these miracles? He was trying to get to His people that He was the mighty Jehovah. And that's what He's trying to do today! He just doesn't heal people just because He can heal. He's trying to get to you that He's the resurrection,...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 31

Earnestly contending for the faith once delivered

Thursday, the 19th of April 1956

56-0419 §20

If we could only find out what kind of a faith they had. If we could find out they were Presbyterian, Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, Catholic, whatever it was, then we could contend for that. So the only just way to do it is to go back and find out what it was. That gets every man; and asks every man a chance and gives God a chance, and gives me a chance tonight to defend what I am standing for, by the Scriptures. For I truly believe that any doctrine that is not based upon this Bible is a heretic. It's not right. I...

Read source context