3 min read654 words

Are There Contradictions in the Bible, or Just Misunderstood Passages?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
No, there are no contradictions in the Bible. Where people think they see a clash, it’s a misunderstood passage, a partial view, or a failure to rightly divide the Word.

2) Scriptural explanation
- The Bible says all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:16). If God breathed it, He didn’t contradict Himself.
- It is impossible for God to lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18).
- The Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35).
- Every word of God is pure (Proverbs 30:5), and the sum of His Word is truth (Psalm 119:160).
- No prophecy of the Scripture is of private interpretation; holy men spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost (2 Peter 1:20–21).
- The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14). That’s why revelation is needed.
- We are told to rightly divide the Word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15) and compare line upon line, precept upon precept (Isaiah 28:10).

3) Simple clarifying logic
One Author does not disagree with Himself. What causes trouble is:
- Not noting who is speaking and to whom.
- Mixing time and setting—different covenants, different purposes.
- Reading one report of an event and ignoring another that completes the picture.
- Taking figures of speech as contradictions instead of seeing God speaking to us in simple, human terms.
- Stopping at a verse instead of letting the whole counsel of God answer.

4) Quick harmonizing examples
- Faith and works: Romans 3:28 says a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law; James 2:24 says a man is justified by works and not by faith only. There’s no clash. Paul is showing how we are made right before God—by faith alone apart from law-works. James is showing the proof of that faith before men—living faith produces works. Abraham believed God (Genesis 15), and years later his obedience vindicated that faith (Genesis 22).
- Judas’ death and the field: Matthew 27:5 says Judas hanged himself. Acts 1:18 says he fell headlong and burst. He hanged himself; later he fell and burst. Both are true. Matthew 27:7 says the priests bought the field with his money; Acts 1:18 says he acquired a field. He did so by proxy—his money purchased it.
- Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew 1 traces the legal royal line through Joseph; Luke 3 traces the bloodline through David’s other son, with Joseph named “as was supposed” and standing as son-in-law to Heli. No contradiction—two lines pointing to the same promised Seed.
- Resurrection reports: One Gospel mentions one angel, another mentions two. If there were two, mentioning one does not deny the other—different witnesses, different details. The women listed differ because each writer highlights what serves his purpose. The message is one: He rose.
- “God repented” vs “God does not repent”: 1 Samuel 15 speaks of God “repenting” about Saul’s kingship—God changed His dealings with Saul because Saul changed. Numbers 23:19 says God does not repent like a man—His nature and promise do not change. When man moves, God’s response changes; God Himself remains true. See Jonah 3:10 and Jeremiah 18:7–10.
- “Three days and three nights”: Jesus said He would rise the third day (Luke 24:7) and also spoke of three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40). In Jewish reckoning, part of a day counts as a day and a night. The testimony is consistent: He rose on the third day, exactly as He said.

Reinforcing statement
Now notice, if Scripture can be broken, why did Jesus say it cannot be broken? You see, the problem is never the Word; it is our understanding. Take all the passages together, let the Spirit who wrote it reveal it, and the seeming contradictions disappear. The Bible stands perfect.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 31

Earnestly contending for the faith once delivered

Thursday, the 19th of April 1956

56-0419 §20

If we could only find out what kind of a faith they had. If we could find out they were Presbyterian, Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, Catholic, whatever it was, then we could contend for that. So the only just way to do it is to go back and find out what it was. That gets every man; and asks every man a chance and gives God a chance, and gives me a chance tonight to defend what I am standing for, by the Scriptures. For I truly believe that any doctrine that is not based upon this Bible is a heretic. It's not right. I...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 31

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §59

Now, this person here, I know in speaking in tongues, it's supposed to be by courses---two, or not more than three. That is correct, but if you'll notice here, if it was... Just like someone give ... up, up there, like Brother Sothmann raised up and give a message in prophecy or speaking in tongues. Interpretation of tongues is prophecy, see, spirit of prophecy. Now, if you just speak in an unknown tongues, there be no interpreter, that person's blessed of the Spirit; but he doesn't hurt the church. Now, what Paul...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 31

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §30

Now, the person speaking with tongues... Now, I have to say something here that may be just a little strange, and if you don't agree with me, that's okay. You see, we misjudge these things so many times. Let's always try to think the very best of anybody who's trying to do what's right. Let's express our very best to them. They're trying. We don't know their heart, unless you have a discernment. And if they're wrong, then if you got... The Bible said, "If a brother be overtaken in a fault, let them which are spirit...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 30

The infallible proof of the resurrection

Monday, the 14th of January 1957

57-0114 §34

I want you to notice something. How could anybody ever think that Satan, or any doctor, or any preacher, or any chiropractor, or anyone else could have anything to do with healing. All healing is divine healing. Could you imagine me breaking my arm, and go and tell the doctor, "Heal my arm right quick. I must finish my work." Why, he'd say, "You need mental healing, Mr. Branham." He'd say, "I can set your arm." "Doctor, I have cut my hand. I can't work with that hand like that. Would you heal it right quick, becaus...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 30

Palmerworm, locust, cankerworm and caterpillar

Friday, the 12th of June 1953

53-0612 §39

Here some time ago, I was speaking with an infidel down the street. And he said, "Preacher, I can prove to you that the Bible is a lie." I said, "You can't. I just don't believe..." He said, "It contradicts itself." I said, "I want you to show it to me," see. I said, "It isn't there." He said, "If I'll prove to you that that Jesus of Nazareth told something wasn't true, would you believe it?" I said, "I don't believe you could do it. Anything that's proved is proved. But" I said, "I don't believe you can do it." He...

Read source context