3 min read654 words

Are There Contradictions in the Bible, or Just Misunderstood Passages?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
No, there are no contradictions in the Bible. Where people think they see a clash, it’s a misunderstood passage, a partial view, or a failure to rightly divide the Word.

2) Scriptural explanation
- The Bible says all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:16). If God breathed it, He didn’t contradict Himself.
- It is impossible for God to lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18).
- The Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35).
- Every word of God is pure (Proverbs 30:5), and the sum of His Word is truth (Psalm 119:160).
- No prophecy of the Scripture is of private interpretation; holy men spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost (2 Peter 1:20–21).
- The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14). That’s why revelation is needed.
- We are told to rightly divide the Word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15) and compare line upon line, precept upon precept (Isaiah 28:10).

3) Simple clarifying logic
One Author does not disagree with Himself. What causes trouble is:
- Not noting who is speaking and to whom.
- Mixing time and setting—different covenants, different purposes.
- Reading one report of an event and ignoring another that completes the picture.
- Taking figures of speech as contradictions instead of seeing God speaking to us in simple, human terms.
- Stopping at a verse instead of letting the whole counsel of God answer.

4) Quick harmonizing examples
- Faith and works: Romans 3:28 says a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law; James 2:24 says a man is justified by works and not by faith only. There’s no clash. Paul is showing how we are made right before God—by faith alone apart from law-works. James is showing the proof of that faith before men—living faith produces works. Abraham believed God (Genesis 15), and years later his obedience vindicated that faith (Genesis 22).
- Judas’ death and the field: Matthew 27:5 says Judas hanged himself. Acts 1:18 says he fell headlong and burst. He hanged himself; later he fell and burst. Both are true. Matthew 27:7 says the priests bought the field with his money; Acts 1:18 says he acquired a field. He did so by proxy—his money purchased it.
- Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew 1 traces the legal royal line through Joseph; Luke 3 traces the bloodline through David’s other son, with Joseph named “as was supposed” and standing as son-in-law to Heli. No contradiction—two lines pointing to the same promised Seed.
- Resurrection reports: One Gospel mentions one angel, another mentions two. If there were two, mentioning one does not deny the other—different witnesses, different details. The women listed differ because each writer highlights what serves his purpose. The message is one: He rose.
- “God repented” vs “God does not repent”: 1 Samuel 15 speaks of God “repenting” about Saul’s kingship—God changed His dealings with Saul because Saul changed. Numbers 23:19 says God does not repent like a man—His nature and promise do not change. When man moves, God’s response changes; God Himself remains true. See Jonah 3:10 and Jeremiah 18:7–10.
- “Three days and three nights”: Jesus said He would rise the third day (Luke 24:7) and also spoke of three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40). In Jewish reckoning, part of a day counts as a day and a night. The testimony is consistent: He rose on the third day, exactly as He said.

Reinforcing statement
Now notice, if Scripture can be broken, why did Jesus say it cannot be broken? You see, the problem is never the Word; it is our understanding. Take all the passages together, let the Spirit who wrote it reveal it, and the seeming contradictions disappear. The Bible stands perfect.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 19

Questions and Answers on Hebrews, part 3

Sunday, the 6th of October 1957

57-1006 §50

Now those four beasts... Now to quickly get this, because I don't want to stay too long on this. But the four beasts... The beast, in Bible, represents "power." And you notice these beasts were not out yonder in the lake or in the sea somewhere coming up, but they were at the throne of God, and they were worshipping God. Those four beasts means four powers that come up out of the earth, and those four powers was the four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John; one don't contradict the other one. And one of them......

Read source context

SermonRelevance 19

God keeps His Word

Sunday morning, the 7th of April 1957 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

57-0407M §89

Anyway, God's Word... We're going to get into that. God's Word cannot cross itself up. It's absolutely the truth. I just want the person to come, put your finger on the Word anytime during the revival to show me a contradiction in God's Word, where it crossed itself up, that can't be straightened out by the Word of God. It isn't there. Sure. It isn't there. There's no contradictions in the Word at all. Absolutely. You can get a subject. I can write you one letter and tell you something, write you another letter, an...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 19

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §51

Now let me say this, that in this case (Remember, God be my judge, this is William Branham), I couldn't say. But in experiences that I have witnessed while under the anointing of such meetings, I believe that the person that's saying the same thing over each time, the same tone of voice, is really speaking in tongues. I do. I believe by the Spirit they're speaking in tongues. If they're Christians, they are speaking with tongues, no doubt. But I believe that you get the wrong slant of interpretation. Now, many time...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 19

We would see Jesus

Thursday, the 12th of July 1962

62-0712 §47

Now, watch closely now what scriptures in the Bible---Old Testament---that testified of Jesus. He said, "The scriptures, they are they which testify of me." Now, if He said that... All Scripture's inspiration, and I want to see that guy that tells me it contradicts itself. It doesn't contradict itself. It's perfectly in harmony. It's hid from the eyes of the wise and prudent---Jesus said so---but would be revealed to babes such as would learn.

Read source context