3 min read654 words

Are There Contradictions in the Bible, or Just Misunderstood Passages?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
No, there are no contradictions in the Bible. Where people think they see a clash, it’s a misunderstood passage, a partial view, or a failure to rightly divide the Word.

2) Scriptural explanation
- The Bible says all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:16). If God breathed it, He didn’t contradict Himself.
- It is impossible for God to lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18).
- The Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35).
- Every word of God is pure (Proverbs 30:5), and the sum of His Word is truth (Psalm 119:160).
- No prophecy of the Scripture is of private interpretation; holy men spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost (2 Peter 1:20–21).
- The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14). That’s why revelation is needed.
- We are told to rightly divide the Word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15) and compare line upon line, precept upon precept (Isaiah 28:10).

3) Simple clarifying logic
One Author does not disagree with Himself. What causes trouble is:
- Not noting who is speaking and to whom.
- Mixing time and setting—different covenants, different purposes.
- Reading one report of an event and ignoring another that completes the picture.
- Taking figures of speech as contradictions instead of seeing God speaking to us in simple, human terms.
- Stopping at a verse instead of letting the whole counsel of God answer.

4) Quick harmonizing examples
- Faith and works: Romans 3:28 says a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law; James 2:24 says a man is justified by works and not by faith only. There’s no clash. Paul is showing how we are made right before God—by faith alone apart from law-works. James is showing the proof of that faith before men—living faith produces works. Abraham believed God (Genesis 15), and years later his obedience vindicated that faith (Genesis 22).
- Judas’ death and the field: Matthew 27:5 says Judas hanged himself. Acts 1:18 says he fell headlong and burst. He hanged himself; later he fell and burst. Both are true. Matthew 27:7 says the priests bought the field with his money; Acts 1:18 says he acquired a field. He did so by proxy—his money purchased it.
- Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew 1 traces the legal royal line through Joseph; Luke 3 traces the bloodline through David’s other son, with Joseph named “as was supposed” and standing as son-in-law to Heli. No contradiction—two lines pointing to the same promised Seed.
- Resurrection reports: One Gospel mentions one angel, another mentions two. If there were two, mentioning one does not deny the other—different witnesses, different details. The women listed differ because each writer highlights what serves his purpose. The message is one: He rose.
- “God repented” vs “God does not repent”: 1 Samuel 15 speaks of God “repenting” about Saul’s kingship—God changed His dealings with Saul because Saul changed. Numbers 23:19 says God does not repent like a man—His nature and promise do not change. When man moves, God’s response changes; God Himself remains true. See Jonah 3:10 and Jeremiah 18:7–10.
- “Three days and three nights”: Jesus said He would rise the third day (Luke 24:7) and also spoke of three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40). In Jewish reckoning, part of a day counts as a day and a night. The testimony is consistent: He rose on the third day, exactly as He said.

Reinforcing statement
Now notice, if Scripture can be broken, why did Jesus say it cannot be broken? You see, the problem is never the Word; it is our understanding. Take all the passages together, let the Spirit who wrote it reveal it, and the seeming contradictions disappear. The Bible stands perfect.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 60

Questions and Answers

Saturday, the 15th of May 1954

54-0515 §79

Now, here's the Scripture, Matthew 28:19, only place in the Bible it ever mentioned these titles: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Now, the way you're baptized is "In the name of the Father, in the name of the Son, and in the name of the Holy Ghost." That's not even in the Scripture. But it is here, "Teach all nations, baptizing them in the name." Now look right at your Bible and see if that says "in the names" or "in the name...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 60

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §103

God sent His message and bears record of it. He confirms the Word with signs following. That's what the Bible says. They can't deny that. It's a fact. But what did they do? They misunderstand it because I didn't come in the name of the Assemblies of God, the Oneness, or the Twoness, or the Threeness, or the Church of God, or the Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Lutheran. I come in none of them names; I come in the name of Jesus Christ. And God, by His mercy, confirms the message by the power of the resurrection of...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 59

How the Angel came to me, and His commission

Monday, the 17th of January 1955

55-0117 §77

Old Brother Bosworth walked out there just like an old diplomat, you know. He had copied off some... He had six hundred different promises of the Bible copied off there. He said, "Now, Doctor Best, if you'll come up here and will take one of these promises and disprove it by the Bible. Every one of these promises is in the Bible, pertaining to Jesus Christ healing the sick in this day. If you can take one of these promises then by the Bible, contradict it with the Bible, I'll sit down, shake your hand, say, 'you're...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 54

Abraham

Saturday, the 8th of December 1956

56-1208 §92

Do you believe out there in the audience? Just a minute. I want to ask you something. I challenge your faith. Jesus was touched one time by a woman, and a woman that touched Him, He turned, and she denied touching Him, but He knew her anyhow, and He told her about her what had happened. Now, the Bible says... I'm trying to make this---if God will permit it---just as Bible days. Now, the Bible said that Jesus is the same today. Is that right? Well, if He is the same, He's the same in principal, power, everything tha...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 51

Questions and Answers (God being misunderstood)

Sunday evening, the 23rd of July 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-0723E §92

The Pharisees. The Pharisee that invited Him down there that time for a dinner, a big banquet, he misunderstood Him. He thought he'd just have Him down there. (I was preaching on that message out here not long ago, at a breakfast, I believe at Chicago, at that breakfast. That Pharisee said, "Now, look at him sitting back there, sitting back there, unwashed feet and everything. That little woman come in and washed him with the tears, and wiped with the hairs of her head." He said, "If he was a prophet he'd know what...

Read source context