Christ Came Through Solomon and Bathsheba. How did David's Son Nathan Come in to It? Reconcile the Genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3?
1) Direct answer
There is no contradiction. Matthew gives the royal, legal line to Joseph through David’s son Solomon. Luke gives the natural, blood line to Mary through David’s son Nathan. Joseph is named in Luke “as was supposed” because he was the husband, the legal head; but the descent there runs through Mary, whose father was Heli. So Jesus has the legal right to David’s throne through Joseph (Solomon’s line) and the blood of David through Mary (Nathan’s line), all without being Joseph’s physical son.
2) Scriptural explanation
- Matthew’s record: “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham” (Matthew 1:1), traces from Abraham down to “Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus” (Matthew 1:16). Notice it never says Joseph begat Jesus. It’s the royal succession through Solomon (Matthew 1:6-7).
- Luke’s record: “Jesus… being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli” (Luke 3:23), then traces back through Nathan, not Solomon (Luke 3:31). “As was supposed” marks that men thought Joseph was the father, but he was not.
- The virgin birth: “A virgin shall conceive” (Isaiah 7:14). “The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee… that holy thing… shall be called the Son of God” (Luke 1:35). So Jesus is not Joseph’s seed.
- Yet He must be David’s seed: “Made of the seed of David according to the flesh” (Romans 1:3). Mary is of David (Luke 1:27), and the Lord gives Him “the throne of His father David” (Luke 1:32).
- The Jeconiah barrier: God said of Coniah/Jeconiah, “no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David” (Jeremiah 22:30). Matthew’s legal line runs through Jeconiah (Matthew 1:11-12). If Jesus were Joseph’s physical son, He would be under that judgment. But He wasn’t Joseph’s seed; He was born of a virgin. Thus:
- Legal right comes by Joseph’s line through Solomon (Matthew).
- Blood descent comes by Mary’s line through Nathan (Luke), bypassing Jeconiah.
3) Simple clarifying logic
- Two sons of David cannot both be Joseph’s fathers. So one record is Joseph’s legal line (Matthew), and the other is Mary’s natural line (Luke), with Joseph named as “son” of Heli by marriage (a son-in-law). That fits the wording “as was supposed.”
- Matthew is about the throne—kingship—so it follows Solomon. Luke is about true humanity all the way to Adam, so it follows Mary’s bloodline through Nathan.
- God guarded the promise perfectly: Jesus is truly David’s Son by Mary, yet not under Jeconiah’s curse; and He holds the legal title through Joseph.
4) Reinforcing statement
You see, the Bible fits like a glove. The virgin birth, Davidic promises, and the two branches—Solomon and Nathan—come together in Christ without a single break in the Scripture.
Ask a Follow-up Question
What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?
Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.
Why little Bethlehem?
58-1228 §65
What did they do? They fought their way through until they got to that well. They dipped the bucket of water out. And here they come back, fighting, cutting their way from right to left, until they come into the presence of David. Said, "Here you are, my lord!" Oh, my! What? A man that was disgraced, a man that was hated by the church, a man that was hated by the king, a man that was hated by the Philistines, a man that was hated everywhere, nearly. But a little group that followed him, they knew that he was the co...
Thy faith has saved thee
54-0411 §31
He found a woman at the well. He talked to her a while till He found out what was wrong with her and told her. He knew where a fish was, had a coin in its mouth. When Philip got converted, he went and found Nathanael. Said, "Come, see who I've found, Jesus of Nazareth." He said, "Could any good thing come out of Nazareth?" Said, "Come see." Philip was standing out in the audience, perhaps. Jesus was casting out evil spirits, praying for the sick. He turned around and seen Philip. He said, "Behold an Israelite in wh...
Behold, a Greater than Solomon is here
62-0721 §27
How many knows (and theologians and Scripture readers that knows) that always the Bible has a compound answer? It always answers, and answers again. It repeats itself. It can never die. It's the eternal Word of God. And here in Matthew, the 3rd chapter, He said here, He said, "Out of Egypt ... it might be fulfilled which was spoke of the prophet, 'Out of Egypt I call my son.' " Run your marginal reading and find out what that was. It was Jacob, his son; but it also referred to Christ, his Son. It always has a compo...
The Identified Christ of all ages
64-0617 §27
Watch Joseph, just portrayed the life of Christ almost perfect. But he made a mistake to show that it wasn't Him. Men make mistakes. See, he told Pharaoh, he said... He told his father---which was a prophet, Jacob---he said, "You tell Pharaoh that we are herdsmen, because a shepherd is an abomination to an Egyptian." But the father ... the Spirit wouldn't let him do it. He said, "Your servants are shepherds." So you see Joseph there making a mistake. David, a great man, made a mistake. A man after God's own heart;...
Do you now believe?
54-0725 §15
And we notice Him, when He was here on earth, when His ministry begin to bloom into its very beginning, there was a man by the name of Philip got converted. He went and found his friend, Nathanael, and he said, "Come..." He found Nathanael under a tree, and he said, "Come, see who we have found: Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of Joseph." Well, this man, being a just man, and kind of shocked him a little bit when he first thought of a change in the ministry, and he said, "Could any good thing come out of Nazareth?" He s...