2 min read431 words

If a Wife Was a Divorcee and Lied to a Brother About It and They Wedded, Is That Marriage Binding on the Brother?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 6/28/2026

Direct Answer
No—if her first husband was still living when they wed, that union is not a marriage before God and is not binding on the brother. If her former husband had already died, then she was free to marry and the marriage is binding despite her lie.

Scriptural Explanation
- The Bible says a wife is “bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth,” and is loosed only by death (Romans 7:2–3; 1 Corinthians 7:39).
- Jesus said, “Whosoever shall marry her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery” (Luke 16:18; see also Mark 10:11–12). So a civil divorce does not dissolve the first covenant while the spouse lives.
- The “exception” of Matthew 19:9 concerns fornication discovered before the marriage covenant (as with Joseph and Mary, Matthew 1:18–20), not a license to dissolve a true marriage and remarry.
- Fraud or lying does not create or dissolve a marriage. The only decisive question is whether a prior, living covenant still bound her (Romans 7:2–3).

Simple Clarifying Logic
- If her former husband was alive, she was still bound to him; therefore the later wedding did not form a lawful marriage. That means:
- The union should be treated as invalid from the start (annulment).
- The brother is not bound and must cease the conjugal relationship.
- After separation and repentance, he is free to marry “only in the Lord,” because no true marriage ever existed.
- If her former husband had died before this wedding, she was free to marry; the present marriage is valid and lifelong. The lie was sin and must be confessed, but it does not dissolve a valid covenant.

Apply the steps
- Was it valid from inception? Only if the former husband was already dead.
- Does it remain binding? Yes, if valid; no, if invalid.
- Separation permitted? Required if invalid; not permitted if valid (though temporary separation without remarriage can occur for grave necessity, 1 Corinthians 7:10–11).
- Annulment? Yes, if a prior living spouse still bound her; no, if she was a widow.
- Remarriage? The brother may marry in the Lord if annulment applies; if the marriage is valid, neither party may remarry while both live (Romans 7:2–3).

One clear conclusion
- If her first husband is alive, the “marriage” is not binding and should be treated as no marriage at all.
- If her first husband is dead, the marriage is binding for life.

If you can confirm whether her former husband is living, I can state the final binding status immediately.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 48

We have seen His star and have come to worship Him

Monday, the 16th of December 1963

63-1216 §34

Now, we find out that the forecast foretells future events before they happen. Strange as it seems, that almighty God foretold, and took the welfare of the baby, Jesus, and revealed it by a dream, what to do. Now that God, in this secondarily way, to His own Son, revealed it to Joseph by a dream. The Bible said He did. Yes, sir. Now, Joseph was a good man, he was the son of David, and he was espoused to Mary. I'd like to pass this on, before we go further. Espousing, in the East, was the same as marriage, is betrot...

Read source context

Church Age BookRelevance 48

An Exposition Of The Seven Church Ages

Chapter 8: The Philadelphian Church Age

CAB 8:E-79

The Judgment of the False Jew Revelation 3:9. "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." Now we can note immediately that this problem of the false Jew or false believers was already in existence in the second age. These who falsely called themselves Jews appeared right after the first outpouring of the first age, and now they appear again in the second age a...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 48

Concerned and convinced

Sunday evening, the 10th of June 1962 at the Bible Tabernacle in Southern Pines, North Carolina, U.S.A.

62-0610E §5

And we are very grateful for all things. I say that for myself and for the people that's here from the Tabernacle. I've got ... or some of our trustees here and deacons and some of my friends from down there. Our pastor is here. I've never been able to see Brother Neville. I guess he's been introduced, has he? Brother Neville? Where are you, Brother Orman? I just can't make you out there. Oh, my! Back there just as big! Come up here a minute! This man I know to be a true servant of Christ. He was a dyed-in-the-wool...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 47

The oneness of unity

Tuesday, the 28th of January 1958

58-0128 §8

Now, speaking of the enemy, of how he perverts righteousness into unrighteousness... Now, that we are a mixed multitude, both men and women, most all adults, so I am sure you will understand. You'd listen to your doctor, and I am your brother. It's legal, and lawful, and godly for a man to take himself a wife, and to live with this wife. But another woman could be the same thing to him, but it would be death to touch her. There is the difference: righteousness perverted.

Read source context

SermonRelevance 47

The waters of separation

Monday, the 6th of June 1955

55-0606 §2

Now, maybe tomorrow night ... and Brother Arganbright, one of the, I believe, chairman of the Christian Businessmen, Full Gospel Internationally, is to be here tomorrow night and stay with us a few nights. Which immediately after the service here, we fly to Zurich, Sweden to begin there---just one day after we leave this service. Pretty heavy schedule on for quite a while, up into Canada and around. And I understand that Brother Toms ... I haven't got to speak to him, but his wife is coming tomorrow, I believe. Is...

Read source context