3 min read524 words

What Is the Scriptural Teaching on the Lord's Supper or Communion?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
The Lord’s Supper is a simple, holy ordinance given by Jesus for born‑again believers to remember His death until He comes. It is not a saving act, not a ritual that changes the elements, but a memorial and a fellowship of the Body. It is to be observed with unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine, in self‑examination, with feet‑washing as a companion ordinance of humility and cleansing.

2) Scriptural explanation
- Instituted by the Lord: “This do in remembrance of Me” (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:23‑26). We “show the Lord’s death till He come.”
- The elements: bread and the cup—“the bread…His body,” “the cup…New Testament in His blood” (Matthew 26:26‑29; 1 Corinthians 10:16‑17; 11:23‑25). Leaven typifies sin, so the figure is unleavened—“Purge out therefore the old leaven…let us keep the feast…with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Corinthians 5:7‑8).
- Who may partake: believers who judge themselves in the light of the Word (1 Corinthians 11:27‑32). The pattern is: repent, believe, be baptized, then continue in the apostles’ fellowship and breaking of bread (Acts 2:41‑42).
- How to approach: in unity and discernment of the Body—making wrongs right first (Matthew 5:23‑24; 1 Corinthians 10:17; 11:29).
- Feet‑washing: joined to the Supper as an example and command—“Ye also ought to wash one another’s feet… I have given you an example… If ye know these things, happy are ye if ye do them” (John 13:14‑17).

3) Simple clarifying logic
- It’s a memorial, not a re‑sacrifice. The Bible says, “Do this in remembrance.” He died once for all; we do not repeat His sacrifice—we remember it.
- The bread remains bread and the cup remains the fruit of the vine. The Bible says they are “symbols” or “communion” of His body and blood (1 Corinthians 10:16). If it literally became His body, why would we still be “remembering” instead of re‑crucifying? The Scripture never says it turns into His flesh.
- Unleavened bread fits the symbol because Jesus was sinless. Leaven marks corruption; Christ had none. You see, the type must match the antitype.
- The table belongs to the Lord, not to a denomination. “Let a man examine himself” (1 Corinthians 11:28). The door is not “closed” by men; it is guarded by the Word in each conscience—walk in the light, judge yourself, and come reverently.
- Frequency is “as oft as ye do it” (1 Corinthians 11:25‑26). The Bible sets no fixed schedule; it sets a right heart.
- Feet‑washing is not optional tradition but a commanded example tied to the Supper. It keeps us small, cleansed, and in brotherly equality.

4) Reinforcing statement
Now notice: the Lord’s Supper is the Gospel in simple tokens—His body broken for us, His blood shed for us—and our lives must match what we take. Come clean, come believing, come discerning the Body, and “show the Lord’s death till He come.”

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 42Broader match

Communion

Sunday evening, the 7th of July 1963 in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

63-0707E §5

Now, let us read the Scripture just as Saint Paul exhorts us here in the book of Saint John the... I beg your pardon, in book of I Corinthians, the a--the 11th chapter, beginning with the 23rd verse. For I have received of the Lord... which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night... which he was betrayed took bread: Wished I had time to--to speak that a little bit. The same night that He was betrayed (You see?), He took bread. And when he had give thanks, he brake it, ... said, Take and eat: t...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 42

Jubilee Year

Sunday evening, the 3rd of October 1954 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

54-1003E §78

My beloved brothers and sisters, whatever there is, if there's anything in your life, contrary to Christ, let's confess it, come up here now and take the Lord's supper; joining our hearts together as one unit of Christian faith, to let our Lord Jesus know that we love Him with all of our heart. Will you do it now, while we play? And, Teddy, if you will... I think they come by sections. Is that right, brethren? Now if the elders will come forward now to help us, and stand here. And where do you start, what side, Bro...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 42

Remembering the Lord

Tuesday, the 22nd of January 1963

63-0122 §13

You know them Eastern people back there has got that thing all mixed up, and I can't get them straightened out on it. And all up in the North, they take me to ... when I go to supper, and they say it's dinner... They say it's breakfast, and lunch, and dinner. Now, where does my supper come in at? I'm trying to find out. And they say, "Oh, that's all." I said, "It wasn't ... we didn't take the Lord's dinner. He called it the supper---the Lord's supper." And I feel like I've missed a meal, if you start calling it tha...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 42

Questions and Answers

Sunday evening, the 28th of June 1959 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

59-0628E §31

The apostles, who was the preachers... They continuedly steadfast in their doctrine of breaking of bread (communion), and in fellowship, and in prayer. Then, if that cuts out communion from the apostles, it also cuts out prayer from the apostles, see. Now, just read on, see. And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. And all the believers were together, and had all things common; And they sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to every man, as every man had need....

Read source context

SermonRelevance 42

Communion

Sunday, the 4th of February 1962

62-0204 §27

Now, you do not commune by radio, because you cannot talk back, or television. But when ... you can by telephone, because you are communing one to another, it just isn't one side. It is ... I cannot commune with you now, because you do not talk back. So, therefore, it would not be coming to hear a minister deliver his message. That would not be, coming together, to communion. Communion would not be that. If you come just to commune with the minister, you'd call him to one side, or any individual, and commune with h...

Read source context