3 min read524 words

What Is the Scriptural Teaching on the Lord's Supper or Communion?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
The Lord’s Supper is a simple, holy ordinance given by Jesus for born‑again believers to remember His death until He comes. It is not a saving act, not a ritual that changes the elements, but a memorial and a fellowship of the Body. It is to be observed with unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine, in self‑examination, with feet‑washing as a companion ordinance of humility and cleansing.

2) Scriptural explanation
- Instituted by the Lord: “This do in remembrance of Me” (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:23‑26). We “show the Lord’s death till He come.”
- The elements: bread and the cup—“the bread…His body,” “the cup…New Testament in His blood” (Matthew 26:26‑29; 1 Corinthians 10:16‑17; 11:23‑25). Leaven typifies sin, so the figure is unleavened—“Purge out therefore the old leaven…let us keep the feast…with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Corinthians 5:7‑8).
- Who may partake: believers who judge themselves in the light of the Word (1 Corinthians 11:27‑32). The pattern is: repent, believe, be baptized, then continue in the apostles’ fellowship and breaking of bread (Acts 2:41‑42).
- How to approach: in unity and discernment of the Body—making wrongs right first (Matthew 5:23‑24; 1 Corinthians 10:17; 11:29).
- Feet‑washing: joined to the Supper as an example and command—“Ye also ought to wash one another’s feet… I have given you an example… If ye know these things, happy are ye if ye do them” (John 13:14‑17).

3) Simple clarifying logic
- It’s a memorial, not a re‑sacrifice. The Bible says, “Do this in remembrance.” He died once for all; we do not repeat His sacrifice—we remember it.
- The bread remains bread and the cup remains the fruit of the vine. The Bible says they are “symbols” or “communion” of His body and blood (1 Corinthians 10:16). If it literally became His body, why would we still be “remembering” instead of re‑crucifying? The Scripture never says it turns into His flesh.
- Unleavened bread fits the symbol because Jesus was sinless. Leaven marks corruption; Christ had none. You see, the type must match the antitype.
- The table belongs to the Lord, not to a denomination. “Let a man examine himself” (1 Corinthians 11:28). The door is not “closed” by men; it is guarded by the Word in each conscience—walk in the light, judge yourself, and come reverently.
- Frequency is “as oft as ye do it” (1 Corinthians 11:25‑26). The Bible sets no fixed schedule; it sets a right heart.
- Feet‑washing is not optional tradition but a commanded example tied to the Supper. It keeps us small, cleansed, and in brotherly equality.

4) Reinforcing statement
Now notice: the Lord’s Supper is the Gospel in simple tokens—His body broken for us, His blood shed for us—and our lives must match what we take. Come clean, come believing, come discerning the Body, and “show the Lord’s death till He come.”

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 39

The Communion

Thursday, the 18th of April 1957

57-0418 §26

Salvation once was not completed, in the offering of the goats, the sheep, the heifers, in the Old Testament, because the Old Testament blood could not atone for sin. It could only cover sin. It was pointing to a time when it would be completed. Tomorrow night we're to get right in on that. But it was only a type. But when Jesus came and His blood was shed at Calvary, it was a complete divorcing of sin. It taken sin away. it's the only means of salvation. There is no church-joining, no letters of fellowship; there...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 38

Communion

Sunday evening, the 7th of July 1963 in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

63-0707E §2

Now, we are having--coming to the communion table. And now, a yet, there's some that doesn't take communion, and maybe you just take it in their own churches, but we'd be happy tonight if you could, would want to, fellowship with us around these things. We never draw any lines of who, just long as you're walking worthy of--of the Gospel that you're--you're listening to and confessing to be part of. You know you're part of this Gospel. You are--you are written epistles of what we're talking about. And as long as we...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 38Broader match

Communion

Sunday, the 4th of February 1962

62-0204 §32

Now, the thing is, that, on this communing, we find out that there was a foot washing and things associated with that, also, to wash our feet, as a symbol of the cleanliness of the Holy Spirit. Now, then there must be a mutual feeling. If you are at edge with your host, then you cannot commune. No, you can't do it, because you're disagreeing with him. But if you are in agreement, then you can commune. So that's the way it is when we come to the Lord's table, we've got to be in agreement with His Word, see. We must...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 37

Questions and Answers

Sunday evening, the 28th of June 1959 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

59-0628E §30

...ter of the Acts, and we will begin, as I said, with the 42nd verse. Now remember, I do not believe that I could say just exactly where the Scripture says that Paul took the communion, and Peter then reached over and taken it; but when they're talking of the congregation, that was in whole, everybody. And I do not believe that Paul would preach something and tell others to do that he would not do. So in the Acts we find this: And they continually steadfast in the apostles' doctrine ... fellowship. Watch! They contin...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 37

Questions and Answers

Sunday evening, the 28th of June 1959 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

59-0628E §35

Now, to back that up, I got a writing here of Josephus, where he claimed that the early Christians after the death of Jesus, that they were considered cannibals, because they took the body of the Lord and ate it. And they thought they had dug it up, and had took it out, and was cutting it up by pieces, and eating it. Which they were taking the communion, see. Now, watch, why this Scripture ... how Paul says here. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread,... Eat of the bread. Now, I know Jesus...

Read source context