3 min read524 words

What Is the Scriptural Teaching on the Lord's Supper or Communion?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 5/5/2026

1) Direct answer
The Lord’s Supper is a simple, holy ordinance given by Jesus for born‑again believers to remember His death until He comes. It is not a saving act, not a ritual that changes the elements, but a memorial and a fellowship of the Body. It is to be observed with unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine, in self‑examination, with feet‑washing as a companion ordinance of humility and cleansing.

2) Scriptural explanation
- Instituted by the Lord: “This do in remembrance of Me” (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:23‑26). We “show the Lord’s death till He come.”
- The elements: bread and the cup—“the bread…His body,” “the cup…New Testament in His blood” (Matthew 26:26‑29; 1 Corinthians 10:16‑17; 11:23‑25). Leaven typifies sin, so the figure is unleavened—“Purge out therefore the old leaven…let us keep the feast…with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Corinthians 5:7‑8).
- Who may partake: believers who judge themselves in the light of the Word (1 Corinthians 11:27‑32). The pattern is: repent, believe, be baptized, then continue in the apostles’ fellowship and breaking of bread (Acts 2:41‑42).
- How to approach: in unity and discernment of the Body—making wrongs right first (Matthew 5:23‑24; 1 Corinthians 10:17; 11:29).
- Feet‑washing: joined to the Supper as an example and command—“Ye also ought to wash one another’s feet… I have given you an example… If ye know these things, happy are ye if ye do them” (John 13:14‑17).

3) Simple clarifying logic
- It’s a memorial, not a re‑sacrifice. The Bible says, “Do this in remembrance.” He died once for all; we do not repeat His sacrifice—we remember it.
- The bread remains bread and the cup remains the fruit of the vine. The Bible says they are “symbols” or “communion” of His body and blood (1 Corinthians 10:16). If it literally became His body, why would we still be “remembering” instead of re‑crucifying? The Scripture never says it turns into His flesh.
- Unleavened bread fits the symbol because Jesus was sinless. Leaven marks corruption; Christ had none. You see, the type must match the antitype.
- The table belongs to the Lord, not to a denomination. “Let a man examine himself” (1 Corinthians 11:28). The door is not “closed” by men; it is guarded by the Word in each conscience—walk in the light, judge yourself, and come reverently.
- Frequency is “as oft as ye do it” (1 Corinthians 11:25‑26). The Bible sets no fixed schedule; it sets a right heart.
- Feet‑washing is not optional tradition but a commanded example tied to the Supper. It keeps us small, cleansed, and in brotherly equality.

4) Reinforcing statement
Now notice: the Lord’s Supper is the Gospel in simple tokens—His body broken for us, His blood shed for us—and our lives must match what we take. Come clean, come believing, come discerning the Body, and “show the Lord’s death till He come.”

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 37Broader match

Communion

Sunday, the 12th of December 1965

65-1212 §19

Then, when we come to the Lord's table, we must come in reverence, love, and respect, of "Look where we would have been if it hadn't been for Him," see. Look where we would've... Therefore, Paul, I think, in saying this, "Wherefore, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for the other," that is, other words, just wait a few minutes, pray, check yourself out. And if you know a brother is in there, just about to do something that's wrong, or something, you pray for him, too. See, "Tarry one ... the other," wait just...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 37

Hebrews, Chapter 7, part 1

Sunday evening, the 15th of September 1957 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

57-0915E §39

When we pull up... On certain nights, when we come together and take communion from the hands of the ministers, representing that we believe in the death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus (that that veil, His body that He was enveiled in, God), we take it as a representative we are dead to the things of the world, and been born anew of the Spirit. And we walk with the body of Christ, all the believers together. When the great battle is finished, and we come up again with Christ, we will take the communion...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 37

Respects

Sunday evening, the 15th of October 1961 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

61-1015E §44

I know of three boys one time that mocked communion in the church, know of them. And they went up in the hotel room and got some ham sandwiches and a bottle of whiskey, and had their communion up there, making fun of the communion they had in a Pentecostal church. Less than three months from then, all three was ... one of them was dead, and two was in the insane institution. You can't disrespect God! You've got to respect God. If you don't believe it, just keep still, keep away from it. Or, either do that, or come...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 37

Questions and Answers

Thursday, the 12th of January 1961

61-0112 §177

Look, when Elijah said to Gehazi, "Take my staff (he had blessed that staff)," he said, "Go on your road. And if anybody speaks, don't speak back. If anybody salutes you, don't salute back. Go on, and lay that staff on the baby." Is that right? "Stay with that staff!" And that's what I was doing. Now, if there had not been an associate pastor here, standing there... I had got through preaching. I remember when it was. And if Brother Neville hadn't have been standing here, or somebody to help that man at the altar.....

Read source context

Church Age BookRelevance 37

An Exposition Of The Seven Church Ages

Chapter 3: The Ephesian Church Age

CAB 3:E-104

Now that we have come this far, let me try to crystallize your thinking on this subject so you can see the necessity of our going into the 'serpent seed doctrine' as I have. We start with the fact that there were TWO trees in the midst of the garden. The Tree of Life was Jesus. The other tree is definitely Satan because of what came forth of the fruit of that tree. Now then, we know that both of those trees had a relationship to man or they would never have been placed there. They must have had a part in the sovere...

Read source context